Collision Industry Conference
1997 Issues Survey


This survey was performed to identify a focus for the C.I.C. in the year to come. The process that was used started with a phone survey completed by Chairman Erick Bickett in which he contacted 18 collision repair shops and seven insurance companies. In these phone surveys the respondents where asked what industry issues they felt the CIC should focus on in 1997. From this phone survey we established the primary issues. We then formulated a written survey to send out to collision repair businesses and insurance companies.

Because of the diversity of opinions between repairers and insurers two separate written survey forms were sent out independently. This survey was sent out to 126 collision repair businesses and 24 insurance companies. We received back 32 completed body shop surveys representing a 25% return, and 11 insurance company surveys representing a 60% return.

The respondents where asked to rate issues by:
1. Priority--in what order should the CIC address the issues? (1-10, 1 = highest, 10 = lowest)
2. Importance--what do you feel is the most important to the industry? (1 = very important, 2 = important, 3 = not important)

Collision Repairer Survey
The report from these surveys will list in order of priority and include the importance rating. The following are the results for the Collision Repair Surveys:

PriorityAvg. Priority Rating Avg. Importance Rating
1 Data Base Times Shrinking 1.5 1.2 or 2nd
2 Declining Margins 1.8 1.1 or 1st
3 Suppressed Labor Rate 2.1 1.4 or 3rd
4a Shrinking Labor Pool 2.7 1.6 or 4th
4b Lack of Computer Standards 2.7 1.8 or 6th
5 Not enough profit to pay and
attract good people
3.0 1.7 or 5th
6 Transfer of Administrative Work
Costs with Direct Repair Programs
3.3 1.7 or 5th

When asked which employees are the hardest to find in the shrinking labor pool, the respondents rated from one to four (1 = hardest, 4 = easiest)
ClassificationAverage Difficulty Rating
Body Technicians 1.4
Paint Technicians 2.3
Office Staff 2.5
Detailers 3.3

When asked what would they do with additional profits, the respondents replied:
PercentageNumber
Reinvest in the business 44% 14
Attract better people 31% 10
Reinvest in Equipment 19% 6
Reinvest in Training 19% 6
Better pay and benefits 13% 4
Pay Down Debt 6% 2
Advertise more 3% 1
(Some respondents had more than one comment; some did not have any comment.)

When asked for the Primary reason for the decline in margins, the respondents replied:
PercentageNumber
Shrinking Data Base Times 31% 10
Higher Overhead 22% 7
Funny Times, Funny Rates 22% 7
Increase in Parts-to-Labor % 19% 6
DRP Programs 13% 4
Insurer Control of Information Data Providers 13% 4
Fewer Line Items Allowed by Insurer 9% 3
Increased Competition 6% 2
Small Margin on Non-OE parts 6% 2
Lower Gross Profit 3% 1
Lower Paint Material Margins 3% 1
Movement towards real time 3% 1
(Some respondents had more than one comment, some did not have any comment.)

When asked what other issues are of concern and CIC should address, the respondents replied:
PercentageNumber
Realistic Labor Rate 9% 3
Insurers Over Controlling 6% 2
Pressure from Insurers for Body
Shops to Absorb More Costs
6% 2
Eliminate DRP and Steering 6% 2
Cost of Electronic Commerce 3% 1
Underlap by Insurers 3% 1
Industry Consolidation 3% 1
Repair Quality Standard 3% 1
(Some respondents had more than one comment, some did not have any comment.)

Insurer Survey
The report from these surveys will list in order of priority and include the importance rating. The following are the results for the Insurer Surveys:
PriorityAvg. Priority RatingAvg. Importance Rating
1 Lack of Trust Between Insurers and Repairers 2.1 1.2 or 1st
2 Claims Process Cycle Time 2.2 1.5 or 2nd
3 Air Bags (totaling cars, new vs. used) 2.3 1.5 or 3rd
4 Title Branding Legislation 3.1 1.5 or 4th
5 Confusion over CAPA Parts with repairers;
lack of desire to use other parts options besides OEM
4.3 2.3 or 5th
6 Diminishing Value Costs 4.9 2.6 or 6th

When asked what other issues are of concern and CIC should address, the respondents replied:
Wasted time, money and friction between insurers and repairers
A way to compensate all shops based on the differences in their experience, equipment, and quality of repair, and not paying all shops the same rate
Fraud in all industry segments
New approach to estimating paint materials